Financial institutions rely on cloud providers, software vendors, managed service providers, payment processors, and other ICT partners to deliver critical services. While these relationships support innovation and operational efficiency, they also introduce risks that can affect business continuity, cyber security, regulatory compliance, and customer service.

 

DORA places significant emphasis on ICT third-party risk management and requires financial institutions to establish controls throughout the vendor lifecycle. Organizations must understand their dependencies, assess risks before onboarding providers, maintain ongoing oversight, and ensure critical services remain resilient even during disruptions.

 

This guide explains how to build a third-party risk management program that aligns with DORA’s requirements and supports operational resilience.

 

 

Understanding third-party risk management under DORA

 

Financial institutions depend on external providers for critical technology services. Cloud infrastructure, payment platforms, software applications, cyber security tools, and managed services often support business functions that are essential to daily operations.

 

When a third-party provider experiences a security incident, service outage, operational failure, or disruption, the impact can extend directly to the financial institution and its customers. Regulators have therefore placed greater attention on how organizations identify and manage these risks.

 

The European Supervisory Authorities’ first annual DORA incident reporting overview found that approximately one-third of major ICT-related incidents reported by financial entities had a cross-border impact. The report also identified system failures and external events as leading causes of incidents, reinforcing the need for strong oversight of third-party providers and outsourced services.

 

What DORA expects from financial institutions

 

DORA requires organizations to manage ICT third-party risk throughout the entire relationship lifecycle.

 

This includes:

 

• Understanding third-party dependencies.
• Identifying providers that support critical functions.
• Performing due diligence before onboarding providers.
• Establishing contractual safeguards.
• Monitoring risks continuously.
• Managing concentration risk.
• Testing resilience and exit arrangements.

 

Importantly, outsourcing a service does not transfer accountability. Financial institutions remain responsible for ensuring operational resilience and regulatory compliance even when activities are performed by external providers.

 

Building a third-party risk management program under DORA

 

Third-party risk management under DORA requires more than conducting periodic vendor reviews. The following practices can help you build a third-party risk management program that aligns with DORA’s operational resilience requirements.

 

1. Identify ICT services and third-party dependencies

 

Create a complete inventory of ICT providers and the services they support. For each provider, document the systems, applications, data, and business processes that depend on their services. Include cloud providers, software vendors, managed service providers, payment processors, cyber security providers, and other technology partners.

 

The objective is not simply to maintain a vendor list. You need visibility into how third-party services support business operations and where disruptions could affect critical functions. Mapping these dependencies often reveals hidden risks, including services that rely on a single provider or critical processes supported by multiple interconnected vendors.

 

2. Classify providers that support critical functions

 

Not every vendor carries the same level of risk. DORA requires organizations to pay particular attention to ICT providers that support critical functions. These are services whose disruption could significantly affect operations, regulatory obligations, customer service, or financial stability.

 

When evaluating providers, consider questions such as:

 

• Would service delivery be disrupted if the provider became unavailable?
• Could customers lose access to essential services?
• Would regulatory obligations be affected?
• How quickly could the service be restored or replaced?

 

Documenting these classifications helps prioritize oversight activities and ensures resources are focused on the providers that present the greatest operational risk.

 

3. Assess risks before onboarding providers

 

Before entering into a new vendor relationship, evaluate the risks associated with the provider and the outsourced services. Review security controls, business continuity capabilities, incident response processes, compliance certifications, data protection practices, and financial stability. 

 

Where subcontractors are involved, assess whether additional supply chain risks are introduced. The assessment should focus on whether the provider can support your resilience requirements and operate within your organization’s risk tolerance.

 

4. Establish contractual controls

 

Review agreements to ensure they clearly define security requirements, incident notification obligations, audit rights, access to information, business continuity expectations, and termination provisions.

 

Obtain information necessary for oversight activities and respond effectively when incidents occur. Contracts should also support regulatory requirements and provide sufficient visibility into outsourced services.

 

5. Monitor third-party risk continuously

 

Risk assessments should not end once a provider has been onboarded. Establish a process to review vendor performance, monitor incidents, assess service changes, and evaluate emerging risks. Critical providers should receive greater oversight based on their importance to business operations.

 

Monitoring activities may include periodic assessments, control reviews, performance reporting, security questionnaires, and discussions with provider representatives.

 

 

6. Manage concentration risk

 

One of the areas that receives significant attention under DORA is concentration risk.

 

Many organizations rely on a small number of cloud providers or technology vendors. While these providers may offer strong capabilities, excessive dependence can create vulnerabilities if services become unavailable.

 

Review your environment to identify situations where multiple critical services depend on the same provider, technology platform, or geographic region. Where concentration risks exist, evaluate whether additional controls, alternative providers, or contingency arrangements are necessary.

 

7. Test resilience and exit strategies

 

Third-party risk management should include preparation for provider disruption. Test business continuity and recovery arrangements involving critical providers. Validate that services can be restored within acceptable timeframes and confirm that responsibilities during incidents are clearly understood.

 

Maintain practical exit plans that outline how services, data, and operations would be transitioned if a provider relationship ended. Exit planning helps reduce disruption and supports operational resilience during significant changes.

 

Building governance around third-party risk management

 

Third-party risk management for financial institutions is not solely the responsibility of procurement, IT, or security teams. Effective oversight requires clear accountability and integration with broader governance and risk management activities.

 

• Define ownership and accountability: Assign responsibility for vendor oversight, risk assessments, remediation activities, and reporting. Different teams may participate in the process, but accountability should be clearly defined.

 

• Establish reporting and oversight processes: Provide management and governance committees with regular reporting on critical providers, risk exposures, remediation activities, and emerging issues.

 

• Integrate third-party risk into enterprise risk management: Evaluate it alongside operational, cyber security, compliance, and business risks. Integrating these activities provides leadership with a more complete view of organizational risk exposure.

 

• Maintain documentation and evidence: Document assessments, risk decisions, monitoring activities, remediation efforts, and governance reviews. Maintaining evidence supports audits and ongoing compliance activities.

 

How CyberArrow supports third-party risk management

 

Third-party risk management under DORA is no longer limited to vendor due diligence or annual reviews. Financial institutions need ongoing visibility into ICT providers, consistent risk assessments, effective oversight of critical third parties, and documented processes that support operational resilience.

 

CyberArrow GRC helps organizations manage these activities through a centralized platform. With CyberArrow, you can:

 

• Maintain a centralized inventory of ICT providers and third-party relationships.
• Conduct and document vendor risk assessments through standardized workflows.
• Identify, assess, and track third-party risks throughout the vendor lifecycle.
• Assign and monitor remediation actions to ensure identified risks are addressed.
• Maintain evidence and audit trails to support regulatory reviews and audits.
• Monitor compliance activities and third-party risk exposure through real-time dashboards and reporting.
• Manage policies, controls, and governance activities from a centralized platform.

 

CyberArrow helps organizations build a more structured approach to third-party risk management while supporting DORA compliance and operational resilience objectives.

 

 

FAQs